The Vampire in Russia: Upir, Upyr and the Origins of Slavic Vampire Folklore
Vampire stories and accounts of animated corpses were once widespread throughout Russia and the Slavic world. Behind their many regional variations lies the same disturbing idea: under certain circumstances, the dead may return in a physical body, leave their graves, and prey upon the living.
Opening of a vampire grave
The belief was by no means restricted to the Slavs, but it became one of the most characteristic features of traditional Slavic supernatural folklore. In Russia the vampire was known as the upyr or upir; related forms occur throughout Eastern and Central Europe, including Ukrainian upyr, Czech and Slovak upír, and Polish upiór. The familiar Western European word vampire ultimately belongs to this same complex of East and South European vampire terminology.
The vampire is not limited to Transylvania: beliefs concerning returning and dangerous dead were widespread throughout the Slavic world.
The Dead Who Refuse to Remain Dead
The traditional vampire is closely connected with burial customs. Among peoples who habitually cremated their dead, fully material “corpse-spectres” appear less frequently. When the body itself has disappeared into the flames, folklore tends instead to imagine vague apparitions, shades, and dreamlike ghosts.
It is by no means certain, however, that cremation was universally practised among the pre-Christian Slavs. The Russian scholar Alexander Kotlyarevsky, in his work on Slavic funeral customs, concluded that no universal practice existed. Some Slavic peoples buried their dead without cremation, while others burned the body and subsequently buried the ashes.
Where an intact corpse was placed in the earth, popular imagination could attribute a strange continuation of life to it. Death did not necessarily mean that the body had become completely inactive. Under exceptional circumstances, it might awaken again—and its impulses toward the living were not always benevolent.
Spirit Beings in European Folklore – Benjamin Adamah
In some traditions the reanimated corpse was believed to be possessed or animated by an evil spirit. Elsewhere no precise explanation was considered necessary. The dead person simply returned.
The German folklorist Wilhelm Hertz famously characterized vampire belief as a specifically Slavic form of the much broader human belief in spectres. That formulation is perhaps too absolute, since corporeal revenants occur in many cultures, but there can be little doubt that the Slavic lands became one of the great historical centres of European vampire folklore.
Archaeological discoveries provide a fascinating counterpart to the literary and folkloric evidence. Across parts of Central and Eastern Europe, archaeologists have uncovered burials in which bodies were decapitated, restrained, weighted down, pierced, or otherwise treated in ways apparently intended to prevent the dead from returning.
Vampire Belief in the Slavic Countries
Animated corpses were certainly not exclusive to Russia or the Slavic peoples. Scandinavian folklore—and particularly the medieval Icelandic sagas—contains numerous terrifying accounts of corporeal revenants. These beings were not necessarily blood-drinkers. They might instead display enormous physical strength, guard their burial places, attack intruders, consume food, torment communities, or pursue other bodily appetites.
Similar traditions occur in German-speaking regions. Significantly, however, many of the areas especially rich in such tales were historically influenced by Baltic or Slavic populations, including parts of East Prussia, Pomerania, and Lusatia.
Among peoples who were Slavic both linguistically and culturally, the vampire tradition became especially elaborate. Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Serbia, Bohemia, Slovakia, and other Slavic regions produced an extraordinary range of stories about corpses that refused to remain peacefully in their graves.
The vampire therefore existed long before Bram Stoker’s Dracula transformed it into an aristocratic Gothic monster. The older creature was usually something much more disturbing: a dead neighbour, relative, sorcerer, criminal, suicide, or otherwise suspicious member of the local community who returned physically from the cemetery.
From the Slavic Vampire to the Greek Vrykolakas
Vampire beliefs also became firmly established among Albanians and modern Greeks. In parts of the Balkans, centuries of contact between Greek, Albanian, South Slavic, Vlach, and other populations produced considerable exchange between supernatural traditions.
This is particularly visible in vampire terminology. The common Modern Greek vrykolakas (βρυκόλακας, with numerous historical spelling variants) is generally regarded as deriving from a Slavic word originally associated with the werewolf. Compare Czech vlkodlak and related South Slavic forms. The linguistic history reflects something important about European folklore: the categories of vampire, werewolf, revenant, witch, and demonic corpse were once far less neatly separated than modern popular culture suggests.
The Vampire in Greece
In areas of Greece less affected by Slavic influence, particularly some islands, indigenous Greek names for dangerous revenants were also preserved. This suggests that the imported Slavic terminology became superimposed upon much older Greek beliefs concerning the restless dead.
Ancient Greek literature itself contains beings attracted to blood. In Homeric descriptions of the underworld, the shades of the dead are temporarily invigorated by sacrificial blood. Other Greek traditions tell of destructive female spirits such as Gello and of restless or dangerous ghosts capable of harming the living.
These ancient beings should not simply be called “vampires” in the modern sense. Homer’s insubstantial shades are fundamentally different from the solid, decomposing, physically active corpse of later Balkan vampire folklore. Nevertheless, the comparison demonstrates that blood, death, bodily vitality, and the temporary restoration of the dead were interconnected ideas in the region long before the appearance of the modern vampire.
The New Revised Edition of Vampires and Vampirism
Vampires in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine
Within the former Russian Empire, vampire traditions were particularly prominent in areas corresponding broadly to present-day Belarus and Ukraine. Here the upyr appears as a genuinely terrifying physical revenant: a corpse capable of leaving its grave, entering houses, attacking sleepers, and consuming blood.
The traditions differ from district to district, but their basic structure remains remarkably consistent. The vampire is dead but corporeal. It returns from the grave. It harms the living. Its activities can cause illness and death, and the community must eventually identify and neutralize the offending corpse.
Ghost orbs—or simply dust particles—photographed at the entrance to a cemetery.
Some Russian and Ukrainian traditions preserve particularly grotesque details. According to one account, if the vampire’s hands have become numb from lying crossed over its breast in the coffin, it uses its teeth instead. These teeth are imagined as being as hard as steel. The creature gnaws its way through whatever obstructs it, enters a house, attacks infants first, and subsequently turns upon the older inhabitants.
One method of detecting such a vampire was to scatter fine salt across the floor. Its footprints could then supposedly be followed back to the cemetery. When the suspected grave was opened, the corpse might be found unnaturally preserved, with rosy cheeks and fresh blood around its mouth—the classic signs by which many European communities claimed to recognize a vampire.
Discover the historical vampire – and its true paranormal horror cases – before it was turned into a TV dandy!
FREE SHIPPING FOR THE UK, USA, AUSTRALIA via global.vamzzz.com
The Turkish Ubir and the Slavic Upir
An intriguing linguistic and folkloric parallel exists in the Turkic ubır or ubir. Related forms include Tatar ubır and Chuvash vupăr. Depending upon the region and source, the term can refer to a vampire-like being, a witch, or another supernatural predator associated with the consumption of human vitality.
The relationship between Turkic ubır and Slavic upir/upyr has long been debated. Their similarity is obvious, but similarity alone does not prove which language borrowed from which—or whether their histories are more complicated.
In Turkic traditions, the ubır may be imagined as feeding upon the vital essence of living beings, sometimes explicitly in the form of blood. Some accounts describe such creatures as swollen or ruddy, features also commonly associated with the supposedly blood-filled corpses of European vampire belief.
The idea that an animal could cause a corpse to become dangerous also occurs across both Slavic and neighbouring traditions. A dog, cat, or other animal jumping across a corpse before burial might condemn the deceased to return as one of the undead.
Upir: What Does the Word Mean?
Forms related to upir occur in numerous Slavic languages: Czech and Slovak upír, Polish upiór, Ukrainian upyr, Russian upyr’, and Belarusian upyr. The Old East Slavic form upir’ demonstrates that the word has a very long history.
Its precise etymology remains disputed. Proposed Proto-Slavic reconstructions include forms such as ǫpyrь and ǫpirь. Some scholars have suggested a connection with Turkic ubır, while other etymologies derive the word internally from Slavic roots.
The Czech linguist Václav Machek, for example, connected upír with verbs conveying the idea of sticking, thrusting, or violently penetrating, thereby interpreting the vampire as something that “thrusts” or “bites.” Such proposals remain hypotheses rather than established facts.
What is certain is that the word itself is medieval. An early occurrence appears in the Old Russian anti-pagan work commonly known as the Word of Saint Gregory, generally dated in its various forms to somewhere between the eleventh and thirteenth centuries. The text refers to pagan offerings or worship directed toward upiri.
This is particularly important for the history of the vampire. It demonstrates that the East Slavic upir was not an invention of eighteenth-century vampire hysteria, Romantic literature, or nineteenth-century Gothic fiction. The name belonged to the supernatural vocabulary of medieval Eastern Europe centuries before Dracula.
Slavic Ideas About the Soul and the Dead
Traditional Slavic vampire belief cannot be understood without considering older ideas concerning the relationship between body and soul.
Death was not always imagined as an instantaneous transition. In many Slavic traditions, the soul remained close to its former home, family, or earthly surroundings for a period after death. Later Christianized folklore frequently specifies forty days before the soul finally departs.
Doors or windows could therefore be opened after a death so that the soul might leave the house freely. Funeral rituals helped ensure that the deceased made the transition correctly. A badly performed burial, an unnatural death, or the morally dangerous status of the deceased could disrupt this process.
Particular anxiety surrounded those who had died violently or prematurely, people excluded from normal religious burial, unbaptized children, suicides, sorcerers, murderers, and other individuals considered spiritually or socially anomalous. Such dead might remain “unclean,” restless, or dangerous.
This provides an important context for the Slavic vampire. The vampire was not simply a monster that happened to drink blood. It belonged to a much larger system of beliefs concerning improper death, corrupted corpses, wandering souls, supernatural pollution, and the dangerous boundary between the living community and its dead.
The Corpse as a Vessel
One interpretation found within this wider belief complex is that the corpse could become inhabited by an unclean spirit. In such cases, the physical body becomes the vehicle through which a supernatural force continues to act in the world of the living.
The resulting vampire requires vitality. Blood provides the most obvious physical representation of that vitality, and so the vampire drains the living in order to sustain its unnatural posthumous existence.
Yet blood-drinking is only one expression of a much broader idea. In traditional European accounts, revenants may consume flesh, gnaw their own bodies, suffocate sleepers, spread disease, exhaust relatives, attack livestock, or mysteriously cause members of the same family to die one after another.
The vampire is therefore better understood as a predatory dead body than simply as a supernatural blood-drinker.
Horrifying Gnawing in the Grave
One of the strangest forms of European vampire belief concerns corpses believed to chew inside their graves.
Among the Kashubians of the region around historical Danzig, now Gdańsk, traditions describe the wieszcz or wieszczy as a dangerous returning dead person. According to older accounts, when such a corpse awakens in its grave, it may begin gnawing its own hands and feet. As the corpse consumes itself, its relatives and neighbours begin to sicken and die.
When its own flesh is exhausted, the revenant may leave the grave at midnight. It can attack cattle, enter houses, or even climb a church tower and ring the bell. Anyone who hears this supernatural bell is doomed to die.
In other versions, the creature behaves more like the familiar vampire and sucks the blood of sleepers. Its victim may be found dead the following morning with only a small wound over the heart.
The Lusatian Wends preserved comparable traditions. A corpse that chews its burial shroud or sucks at its own breast may magically draw its surviving relatives after it into the grave.
These beliefs belong to the wider Central European tradition of the Nachzehrer—literally an “after-devourer”—in which the corpse consumes something in the grave while simultaneously draining the vitality of the living.
Vampires, Werewolves and the Nightmare
Romanian and neighbouring traditions provide further examples of how unstable supernatural categories could be. The moroi, strigoi, werewolf, witch, nightmare spirit, and vampire overlap considerably in older folklore, even though later writers often tried to classify them as completely separate beings.
Some vampire-like creatures could assume animal form: dog, cat, toad, wolf, or even a blood-sucking insect. When a suspected vampire was exhumed, observers might interpret ordinary processes of decomposition as supernatural evidence. Growing-looking nails, swollen bodies, darkened skin, or fluid emerging from the mouth, nose, eyes, or ears could all be interpreted as proof that the corpse remained active.
To modern eyes these are recognizable effects of post-mortem change. To a frightened rural community confronting a sequence of unexplained deaths, they could appear to offer horrifying physical confirmation that the suspected corpse was feeding upon the living.
How Did a Russian Vampire Attack Its Victims?
Russian folktales occasionally describe vampire attacks with extraordinary directness.
In one story, a peasant accompanies a mysterious stranger into a house where an old man and a young man are sleeping. The stranger places a bucket beside the younger sleeper and strikes him on the back. His back miraculously opens and blood pours into the vessel.
The stranger drinks the entire bucket.
He then repeats the operation upon the old man, fills another bucket with blood, and drinks that as well. As dawn approaches, the creature announces that it is time to return to its dwelling.
Such stories are important because they reveal a vampire considerably removed from the elegant nocturnal seducer of later literature. There is no aristocratic castle, hypnotic count, erotic bite, or sophisticated supernatural predator. The folkloric vampire is brutal, physical, and grotesque. Human beings are reduced quite literally to containers of blood.
FREE SHIPPING FOR THE UK, USA, AUSTRALIA via global.vamzzz.com
How to Stop a Vampire
Russian folktales and wider Slavic traditions provide numerous methods for neutralizing a suspected vampire. The best known is driving a stake through the corpse.
In Russian traditions, aspen was particularly favoured. Elsewhere thorn wood might be preferred. The choice of material was rarely accidental: particular trees possessed religious, magical, or apotropaic associations.
Staking, however, was not always sufficient.
According to a story cited by the German folklorist Wilhelm Mannhardt, a Bohemian vampire staked in 1337 merely mocked his attackers, remarking that the stick would be useful for keeping dogs away. Another tale, concerning a strigon or Istrian vampire near Laibach in 1672, claims that the corpse simply pulled the sharp wooden weapon from its own body and contemptuously threw it back.
More radical measures were therefore employed. Decapitation was common. Burning the corpse was even more decisive because it physically eliminated the body through which the vampire was believed to operate.
Some traditions prescribe striking the vampire on the back of the head with a gravedigger’s shovel. Among the Wends, it was said that a vampire struck in this way would squeal like a pig.
These violent procedures were not merely inventions of folktales. Historical records from Central and Eastern Europe document communities exhuming suspected vampires, cutting off their heads, piercing their bodies, removing or burning organs, and finally destroying the corpse by fire.
Why Did Someone Become a Vampire?
There was never a single explanation for the origin of a vampire. Almost anything that placed a person outside the normal boundaries of society, religion, or natural death could make the corpse suspect.
Sorcerers and witches were obvious candidates. So were suicides, murderers, criminals, people who died violently, and those cursed or excommunicated by the Church. An individual cursed by his or her own parents might also be considered vulnerable to an abnormal existence after death.
But moral guilt was not always necessary.
Even an entirely respectable person could become a vampire through accident. Someone killed by a vampire might become one in turn—a concept later made famous by literature and cinema. A cat or other animal jumping over a corpse could transform it. In some traditions even a bird flying over the body was sufficient.
Other vampires were supposedly marked from birth. A child conceived through an unnatural or forbidden union might be destined for vampirism, and folklore occasionally imagined the Devil or even an animated corpse as the supernatural father of such a child.
The enormous variety of these explanations reveals something fundamental: vampire belief functioned as a way of explaining abnormal death and abnormal decomposition. Whenever the normal relationship between body, soul, burial, family, and community appeared to have been disturbed, the possibility of the returning dead emerged.
The Single Blow
One particularly curious motif concerns the number of blows used against the vampire.
Some traditions insist that the stake must be driven through the corpse with one single blow. A second strike might revive rather than destroy the vampire.
This motif has parallels in folktales in which heroes are warned never to strike a magical enemy twice. Even when mysterious voices urge them to “strike again,” they must resist. The first blow destroys; the second restores.
The rule belongs to an old magical logic in which repetition does not necessarily strengthen an action. Instead, a second act may reverse the first.
The Russian Vampire Before Dracula
The Russian upyr provides an important corrective to the modern image of the vampire. Long before the creature became an elegant aristocrat in Gothic fiction, Eastern European folklore knew the vampire primarily as a dangerous corpse.
It might drink blood, but it could also gnaw its shroud, consume its own flesh, attack children, destroy livestock, spread illness, or cause its relatives to die mysteriously. It belonged simultaneously to beliefs about death, disease, burial, witchcraft, restless souls, and the supernatural contamination of the living by the dead.
This older vampire is consequently both stranger and, in many respects, more frightening than its literary descendant.
The vampire does not need a castle.
It only needs a grave—and a reason to leave it.
Adapted for this blog from W. R. S. Ralston, Russian Folk-Tales: A Choice Collection of Muscovite Folk-Lore, with additional editorial clarification and historical context.
See also:
The Evil Eye: A 3,000-Year-Old Blood-Drinking Predator
Spirit Beings in European Folklore
The banshee
Historical werewolf cases in Europe
Poltergeist
The incubus or succubus – nightmare or astral sex date?
Aura protection – How to protect your energy field from negative influences
Mountain spirits
The Mysterie of the White Ladies
Wild man or Woodwose
Black cat superstitions
Sex and Mediumship – quotations on the observation of ectoplasma
Allan Kardec -Life after death as a science…
Aura Colors – What do they mean?
Thirty Years among the Dead
animal ghosts and apparitions
Black dog apparitions
Thought forms – Thoughts condensed on purpose or by accident
Top 7 techniques for inducing an Out of Body Experience (OBE)
